data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9e1b/f9e1b0041c22a4c36bd6e28c4688fd7655e676cc" alt="Taurus gx4 9mm"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/402ba/402bac34613f69b1eb1be307b67a2f0e43c1fe2d" alt="taurus gx4 9mm taurus gx4 9mm"
The Shield Plus, on the other hand, has a set of three-dot white painted sights. The Taurus GX4 has a white dot in the front sight, and the rear sight is blacked out with horizontal serrations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97757/97757d287b3b67ad23893c7295b50eb62a7305bd" alt="taurus gx4 9mm taurus gx4 9mm"
Sightsīoth of these guns have fundamental sight ops. The winner’s the Taurus GX4 vs the Smith & Wesson Shield when it comes to the slide. The slide is also wider on the Taurus GX4, which just gives you more to grab onto when cocking the slide. The Taurus GX4, on the other hand, has a slide that feels slightly easier to rack, and the serrations are also a much better design. But the serrations on the front are only around an eighth of an inch tall and are pretty much useless for anything but press checks, and for that type of press check, you don’t need serrations at all. The serrations on the Smith & Wesson Shield are excellent and some of them are my favorite. Both of these slides have forward-cocking serrations, although the Smith & Wesson Shield’s are for aesthetics only. The slides on these two firearms take a different approach in design.
Taurus gx4 9mm plus#
That said, I don’t see much of an advantage with a more aggressive texture on the Smith & Wesson Shield Plus because the texture on the Taurus GX4’s serrations is good enough. But if you like a less aggressive texture, you’ll like the Taurus GX4. If you like a more aggressive texture, then the winner will be the Smith & Wesson Shield. The Taurus GX4, on the other hand, has an aggressive texture that’s aggressive enough for shooting, but it’s not going to bother almost anyone when it comes to concealed carry. I don’t think it would bother me personally, but it could bother some more sensitive users. It’s much more aggressive and might be a little too aggressive for some people when carrying inside the waistband. They both have a sandpaper-like texture, but I would say the texture on the GX4 feels more like 600-grit while the Smith & Wesson Shield Plus feels more like 250- or 300-grit sandpaper. This can be an excellent feature for newer and inexperienced shooters as it forces your hand high up on the gun without much work. You don’t have to work hard at all to maintain a high grip on this firearm. The high undercut, as well as the large bump and the rear of the grip, really force your hand high into the grip. The Taurus GX4, on the other hand, has a very well-designed set of ergonomics. I can see how some users might like this more than the ergonomics on the GX4. There is something about the ergonomics on the Smith & Wesson Shield, though. The trigger undercut on the Taurus GX4 is much higher, and that allows me to get a similar amount of my hand on the grip as I can with a Smith & Wesson Shield, despite it being a quarter-inch taller than the GX4. These guns, despite being similar in height, have a different ergonomic stature. Now, as for the feel of the grip itself, the Smith & Wesson Shield Plus allows me to get the same amount of my pinky on the grip as the GX4 does. So how good is this on a gun that size? Well, that’s arguable, but it is a nice feature to have and cool that Taurus could incorporate it. This is not a feature of the Smith & Wesson Plus. The Taurus GX4 is the first gun of its size class to offer interchangeable backstraps. Shop for the Best Prices on In Stock SW Shield Plus’sĮuro Optic | Grab A Gun | Primary Arms | PSA | Brownells | FrameĪ significant difference between the Taurus GX4 and the Smith & Wesson Shield Plus will be the modularity aspect. Right off the bat, you will notice that the grip on the Shield Plus and other dimensions are more significant than the GX4. Nevertheless, some people can do it, although that won’t be most of the market. That said, they might fill slightly different roles.įor example, the Taurus GX4 could work for pocket carry for many people, while the Smith & Wesson Shield Plus will likely be a little bit big for pocket carry for most users. Taurus GX4 vs SW Shield Plus Concealed Carryīoth of these guns are suited for concealed carry. Height (top of slide to bottom of magazine baseplate) (Inches) We’ll go over that in detail in our Taurus GX4 vs Smith & Wesson Shield Plus concealed carry segment below this chart. These guns take different approaches when it comes to the size of the firearm. The Smith & Wesson Shield Plus is a new offering from Smith & Wesson based on the venerable SW Shield. However, the Taurus GX4 is a brand new firearm that Taurus built from the ground up. Both of these guns were released around the same time and have a lot to offer. We’re going to compare the Taurus GX4 vs SW Shield Plus.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9e1b/f9e1b0041c22a4c36bd6e28c4688fd7655e676cc" alt="Taurus gx4 9mm"